Laaker.com - Latest Comments in In Defense of the Animal Cracker

Re: In Defense of the Animal Cracker

Micah Laaker — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 00:42:58 -0000

Really great point there, Ricky, and very cogent. Also grt spllng; I can tell you're in a rush to get on to sharing your folksy wisdom on other blogs. Good day to you, as well.

Re: In Defense of the Animal Cracker

ricky — Fri, 12 Sep 2008 21:38:13 -0000

wow seriously...calling them animal crackers
and not animal cookies doesnt rly matter.
the name of the "cookie" is animal "cracker"
so its not rly that big a deal
and if u think so, get a life.
good day.

Re: In Defense of the Animal Cracker

Micah Laaker — Mon, 16 Jun 2008 15:02:05 -0000

Good catch. I've updated accordingly.

Re: level of seriousness, you are correct... I take Big Biscuit's actions very seriously. Who knows what's next? Triscuits might soon be labeled a "hearty wheat cake," and next thing you know, BAM!, cakes as we know them disappear from the planet.

Re: In Defense of the Animal Cracker

nicole — Sun, 15 Jun 2008 18:30:26 -0000

Good, I got you "crackers" and not "cookies". *shwew*

Re: In Defense of the Animal Cracker

Seldo — Sun, 15 Jun 2008 04:20:21 -0000

You... may be taking this matter a little seriously. Also, your link to Stauffer's crackers goes to Keebler instead.