DISQUS

DISQUS Hello! Laaker.com is using DISQUS, a powerful comment system, to manage its comments. Learn more.

Community Page

Laaker.com

Jump to original thread »
Author

In Defense of the Animal Cracker

Started by That Kid from Omaha · 1 year ago

The “animal cracker” is an often misunderstood delight, deserving of detail and defense in an era of mislabeling and generalizations.

According to Wikipedia’s definition of “animal cracker,” they are “crackers in the shapes of animals… They are like crackers due to the way they are made, with layered ... Continue reading »

5 comments

  • Seldo

    1 year ago

    You... may be taking this matter a little seriously. Also, your link to Stauffer's crackers goes to Keebler instead.
    reply
  • That Kid from Omaha

    1 year ago

    Good catch. I've updated accordingly.

    Re: level of seriousness, you are correct... I take Big Biscuit's actions very seriously. Who knows what's next? Triscuits might soon be labeled a "hearty wheat cake," and next thing you know, BAM!, cakes as we know them disappear from the planet.
    reply
  • nicole

    1 year ago

    Good, I got you "crackers" and not "cookies". *shwew*
    reply
  • ricky

    9 months ago

    wow seriously...calling them animal crackers
    and not animal cookies doesnt rly matter.
    the name of the "cookie" is animal "cracker"
    so its not rly that big a deal
    and if u think so, get a life.
    good day.
    reply
  • That Kid from Omaha

    9 months ago

    Really great point there, Ricky, and very cogent. Also grt spllng; I can tell you're in a rush to get on to sharing your folksy wisdom on other blogs. Good day to you, as well.
    reply

Add New Comment

Returning? Login