DISQUS

Laaker.com: In Defense of the Animal Cracker

  • Seldo · 1 year ago
    You... may be taking this matter a little seriously. Also, your link to Stauffer's crackers goes to Keebler instead.
  • That Kid from Omaha · 1 year ago
    Good catch. I've updated accordingly.

    Re: level of seriousness, you are correct... I take Big Biscuit's actions very seriously. Who knows what's next? Triscuits might soon be labeled a "hearty wheat cake," and next thing you know, BAM!, cakes as we know them disappear from the planet.
  • nicole · 1 year ago
    Good, I got you "crackers" and not "cookies". *shwew*
  • ricky · 1 year ago
    wow seriously...calling them animal crackers
    and not animal cookies doesnt rly matter.
    the name of the "cookie" is animal "cracker"
    so its not rly that big a deal
    and if u think so, get a life.
    good day.
  • That Kid from Omaha · 1 year ago
    Really great point there, Ricky, and very cogent. Also grt spllng; I can tell you're in a rush to get on to sharing your folksy wisdom on other blogs. Good day to you, as well.